REQUIRED READING FOR NEW MEMBERS
Who is Trinity Freedom Ministries, SSM?
Our ministry and web site members are a private member association. We merely believe in the free right of man to have open discussion and research as to how our system of law works, based on common laws established by God, and to help one another understand how to be more effective in their own law situations through education, and with assistance to private counsel among our association members.
DISCLAIMER: At Trinity Freedom Ministries, SSM we WHOLLY discuss and support the concept of "right to counsel and free information sharing" (vs "legal advice"). A mere open discussion and sharing among free living men and women cannot be regulated. We do participate in helping people educate themselves and learn how to perform more effectively in their "common" law methods to resolve matters. Therefore, we do not give ""legal" advice, nor can we be held liable for any outcomes from the actions taken by the user or participant in this website and efforts. Many contibutors add content here. Any such claims of damage shall be considered only as it applies in common law and between a living man/woman who can prove they are a verifiable damaged party willing to testify to that claim.
We do not protest the government or it’s agencies, all though we do advocate the government obeys the law and acts to protect the people, as their trust fiduciary duty requires. We do not condone attacks or suing the innocent. We encourage peaceful and proper interaction between government, corporations, and the “people” who the government “serves”. We also state for the record, we encourage anyone who owes a verified bill, debt, an obligation to file the required forms, or if there is a verified contract obligation they should keep those commitments. The contracts is the law. We suggest merely how to verify the authority of any claim made against you, by anyone or any entity. We want you simply learn how to say – “prove it”, before you presume a claim is true! You'll be surprised how often they can't prove it LAWFULLY.
FURTHER DISCLAIMERS and Belief Regarding Right to Counsel (as many members assist other members). Our Ministry merely provides our Members private association discussion and research support for common law and self speaking men and women. Many people find themselves protecting their own God given rights pursuant to the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and according to Article 1, Section 22 of the Washington State Constitution (and relevant Oregon Constitution). WE DO NOT PROVIDE ANY KIND OF LEGAL ADVICE, AND WE DO NOT WANT TO GIVE ANY IMPRESSION THAT WE DO. WE APOLOGIZE TO ANYONE WHO MAY HAVE INTERPRETED WHAT WE DO AS ANY SORT OF ADVICE FOR FEE. It is undisputed that everyone has a Constitutional right to defend themselves and seek any counsel of their choosing. It is undisputed that when one is defending themself in person, they have all the same rights as any Attorney (even more), and one has the right to hire a para-legal or seek private counsel of one's choice. Members often deal with needs requiring help in serious civil and sometimes criminal matter research. Be sure to seek competent professional legal a counsel when needed. Private Members often provide effective private “assistance of counsel” to one another, We do not provide such assistance personally, as contemplated by the Sixth Amendment and the first Judiciary Act of 1789 as was passed on September 24, 1789, which is an Act of Congress, see 1 Stat 73 at section 35 and 28 U.S.C. 1654, and we dohelp educate people who want to appear and defend in person to fight their own cases [Pro-se] or as a living man or woman, without an attorney by utilizing private counsel.
FURTHER RESEARCH ON PRACTICE OF LAW
For many, there is confusion between the terms practicing law and private counsel. The following research summary clarifies many points of interest. Based on substantial research and analysis and legally admissible evidence, we can safely conclude the following:
- There is no such thing legally defined anywhere in any enactment of any government that is specifically called a “license to practice law”.
- An “Admission to Practice” issued by the U.S. Supreme Court functions as the de facto equivalent of a “license to practice law”.
- Individual courts also issue admissions to practice to attorneys who VOLUNTARILY apply for it.
- Neither the Constitution nor any legislative act within any state of the Union can or does specifically authorize a justice of the state Supreme Court to issue “Admissions to Practice”. Therefore, there is no authority and can be no lawful authority to issue such grants of privilege.
- The Ninth and Tenth Articles to the United States Constitution specifically reserve all powers not delegated by the Constitution to the People or the States respectively. Therefore, the Federal government has never been empowered to issue “licenses” or “admissions” to practice law. Neither can this authority be implied from the “necessary and proper” clauses found anywhere in the Constitution.
- The idea of "licenses to practice law" is therefore primarily a “judicial doctrine” that cannot adversely affect the Constitutionally protected rights of any man or woman.
- All those persons represented by a licensed attorney are “wards of the court”, incapable of executing their own defense or litigation. As such, "licensed attorneys" are there to represent them as “incompetents” and the authority of the state to license such attorneys derives from the need to protect such incompetent persons.
- It is not a crime to practice law without a license and there can be no adverse consequences for doing so for any person not domiciled on federal territory under exclusive federal jurisdiction, so long as the person doing so identifies themselves NOT as an “attorney”, but as a “Counselor at Law”.
- The only case where any judge or public official may mandate or influence one’s choice of counsel is in the case of public traded entities, such as corporations. Private corporations and private persons may not be controlled or regulated in their choice of legal “counsel” to only those who have been licensed or admitted to practice by the state supreme Court.
The only legitimate purpose for “licensing” of attorneys is to protect the public. In practice, public servants abuse this regulatory authority delegated to them NOT to protect the public, but to stifle all attorneys from speaking the truth in open court about government and official corruption, especially as it pertains to the judiciary.
10.2. Establish and further the ends of a legal profession monopoly on the practice of law designed to further their own private economic ends.
The authority to “practice law” conveyed upon “counsel” or a “counselor at law”as a private para-legal (vs paralegal) includes the following:
11.1. Preparing pleadings, discovery, and execute discovery.
11.2. Arguing issues of law before the court.
11.3. Advising the assisted party of his rights and options.
The word “attorney” is not equivalent to “counsel” as used in the Sixth Amendment. All licensed “attorneys” may also be classified as “counsel”, but not all counsel need be licensed attorneys within the meaning of the Sixth Amendment. Any claims to the contrary will require proof of a damaged party, as a result of “unlicensed practice of law”, by the living man or woman who is a damaged party due to this mysterious "practice", who will testify under oath and quote the law and/or contract which applies where someone was practicing law without disclosure of these facts.Any reader / member of this web site is so noticed.
SPONSORS AND TOOLS
YoCoin – Get on the next generation private Digital Currency. Bitcoin made many wealthy. Could this be the next one? Check it out now and REGISTER for TJ's team HERE with as little as $50 deposit to your account to activate. Get more details and compensation plan details HERE
The Billion Coin – the crypto currency that expects to never goes down in value DETAILS HERE
Learn about the new genetic Medical Labs breakthrough that can actually predict diseases years in advance. Earn close to $200 per test a doctor orders from your one time referral, and some doctors run 20 to 40 a month! Just one doctors could pay you $5,000 to $10,000 + monthly residuals OPPORTUNITY VIDEO JOIN HERE
How to Win In Court Without and Attorney – The essential procedural law training tool for all members studying to succeed DETAILS HERE
Form Your Own Private Ministry – Develop your not for profit purpose to serve, with full privacy and protections that state controlled non-profit entities may not provide. Not to be used for just asset hiding or tax avoidance, but for a real mission to serve your brother. HERE