Every American Better Be Watching The Bundy Story Today


The Bundys from Anna von Reitz

Many people have asked me what our Living Law Firm has done or is doing for the Bundys and others involved in the Oregon Wildlife Refuge Stand-Off. Even I have wasted time and money writing letters and making phone calls and posting on Facebook to no avail—- and just like Thomas Deegan in West Virginia, you can’t help Stubborn and Wrong.

Just recently I have had word that one of the Bundys might be starting to listen, but only because they have run out of money to pay “real” attorneys. Sigh.


The Bundys are being prosecuted under the false presumption that they are “United States Citizens” or “citizens of the United States” when they are not.. United States Citizens have never been protected by the guarantees of The Constitution, so, as long as you agree that you are a United States Citizen— guess what? There’s no use arguing any “constitutional” defenses. And there is no use arguing that they are being wrongfully prosecuted, because as “United States Citizens” they are subject to every little jot of Federal Code and Statute. That includes “federated” State Statutes, too. 

Now, have you ever seen a snake try to eat something grossly much bigger than itself so that the intended food gets stuck on its fangs? Unless some kind soul comes along and unlocks its jaws, the snake will thrash around and starve to death.  

What should happen is that the Bundys and their friends should go into court and say, “Your Honor, there’s been a mistake here, and we made it. We were misinformed about several things. We were told that we had to sign up for Social Security, that it was mandated for us by our government—- and that turns out not to be the case. We were told we had to have Driver Licenses, too, and that turns out not to be true, either. We aren’t United States Citizens. We are United States Nationals so far as international affairs are concerned, and here at home we are what you call American State Nationals. We are sorry about the confusion. Here’s the Social Security Cards we were given and the Driver Licenses, too. And here’s the Birth Certificate our parents were given as the insurance indemnity receipt guaranteeing the well-being and safety of our “cargo”.

We were never told what it was until very recently. We thought it was just a record of us being born.” All that process should take about 30 seconds, cost virtually nothing, and requires only three documents. “Now, your Honor, this has all been a big mistake— a case of mistaken identity. We must be set free and our losses made whole.”

Remember that old snake trying to eat the world? That’s the look on the judge’s face right about now. He and his cohorts have knowingly prosecuted their employers under false presumptions. Their court and the corporation they are working for are on the stick for it. Unless they want to commit war crimes in open court—- crimes that carry the death penalty— they truly do need to do a double flip spin in the air, 180 degree flip-flop in front of God and the whole world— and release the Bundys and their friends and return all their losses, plus damages.

The Bundys and their friends actually are the Landlords who are owed the Wildlife Refuge and every other particle of land in the western states. The Federales are just employees, working under contract as property managers. But as long as you put up with this crappola and let the Feds pretend that you are one of them and thus subject to their rules(ie: codes and statutes), you look like a small and tasty bite.

Let’s take this a little bit farther— What if there was a man in your community who was known to be a murderer, a bully, and a thief? What if he was also so slick, so cunning, and so adept at pressuring people and buying them off and threatening them, that no matter what he does—- even murder in broad daylight— like Waco and Ruby Ridge he continues to get away with it?  Okay, what if it isn’t a man? What if it is an organized crime syndicate, set up like the mafia, operating as a corporation? And what if that corporation is operating under "color of law", pretending to be part of your legitimate government simply because they have a contract to provide “governmental services”? Hmmm?

That’s what we’ve got here. That’s what we are dealing with. The private, for-profit corporation literally calling itself the “GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES” —- this is no joke—-is listed on Dunn and Bradstreet. And under “GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES” you find numerous subsidiaries including the “BLM” and the “FBI”.  “NORTHERN TRUST” is listed as the owner/operator of the “IRS” and the “AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION”. 

Now, you can go up against these groups of criminals with fists and pitchforks, or you can object to their criminality and liquidate them—-expose them for what they are and how they are operating, bring charges against them, and “pull their charters”. Suddenly, they have no funding, no way to pay for their mercenaries, and no way to harm anyone, unless their shadowy bosses have grit enough to go one on one with Clive Bundy.  And I really don’t think they do. That’s why they are hiding behind legal pretenses and false fronts in the first place. That’s why they are so scared of guns.

So what I am very broadly suggesting—-again—-to everyone concerned, is to take a bit of advice from George V, the British Monarch primarily responsible for this latest round of thuggery on our soil—–don’t get mad. Keep calm and get even. If any of my readers have direct contacts with the Bundy Clan, or Thomas Deegan, or Schaeffer Cox, or others facing federal prosecution, please forward this blurb to their attention.

It’s a very simple, direct, and effective solution. It costs virtually nothing. It’s peaceful. Almost effortless. What more could you ask for? . And what do you have to lose? . If I am right, you get your freedom— freedom like you have never had before; you get your losses repaired, plus damages, which after what you’ve gone through would be very nice, indeed. If I am wrong, well, there will be some British Subjects set up for the gallows of the new Nuremburg Tribunal, and you can hardly be worse off than you already are.

If you have already been tried and convicted “by mistake” submit the paperwork for a mis-trial hearing based on new information and challenge the court’s jurisdiction. Please note that this will not work for people who legitimately are United States Citizens or “citizens of the United States”—– which includes federal civilian and military employees, COMMENT DELETED, federal welfare recipients (Retirees— remember you are retired and those are not Social Security “Benefits” you are receiving – if you paid in and were vested in the Social Security System-they are your funds), or political asylum seekers or if you are knowingly and willingly operating a "federal franchise" corporation. 

Be careful what you volunteer for! They require it to touch you.


8 thoughts on “Every American Better Be Watching The Bundy Story Today

  • September 2, 2016 at 7:38 pm

    Noting your statement below are you telling me that African Americans have no option than to be a U.S. citizen and cannot access the same freedom as White Americans? If so, them what is the remedy for African Americans? And what about Hispanics?

    " Please note that this will not work for people who legitimately are United States Citizens or “citizens of the United States”—– which includes federal civilian and military employees, African Americans, federal welfare recipients ……………

    • September 3, 2016 at 2:33 am

      Good point actually. I simply posted anna article that was sent to me. I deleted that comment because I agree that part is not accurate.

    • September 3, 2016 at 4:26 am

      Ronin, All people are the beneficiaries of the Declaration and Indenture Covenant of a Trust I specify in my recent comment. Those who elect to remain in the Babylonian debt slave jurisdiction currently in play has the free will choice to do so.

      MJT, Yes, it is my opinion that Anna has a habit of presenting half truths as well as bloviating with intentional and confusing interjections to bluff the masses to fall for her continuation of the malum prohibitum jurisdiction based on statutory enslavement for the elite's (Vatican) benefit which will result in about 200 million left on earth as slaves to those pukes.  It's only lipstick on a pig. 

    • September 5, 2016 at 3:07 am

      I delted that one comment as I found that to be of base.  As always, everyone need to do their own reseach, articles we are given to post are is just a beginning to waking many up.

  • September 2, 2016 at 10:37 pm

    Anna, FYI, Thomas David House of Deegan and two other gentlemen from West Virginia has already put these criminals in default and dishonor in law, at law and otherwise and they continue to operate without their charter perpetrating more and more fraud each and every second of their continued exsistence of purporting to be lawful government.  They are operating under the law of conquest and there is no other way to define it. 

    Watch the YT video link provided below for true fact evidence of their unlawful incorporation:


    Here is a link to all the legal filings and responses pertaining to their total default and dishonor:


    Here's the Declaration and Indenture Covenant of a Trust which was officially put into force on the fourth day of August two thousand sixteen:


    Here's a real current, corporate oath renouncement along with an oath to the beneficiaries (the people) as opposed to the oath purported Judge Curry attempted to trap people into.  I copied and pasted it below:

    Trustee Order


    By, and under, the authority of clauses 2.4, 2.5, 3.2, 3.3, 4.5, 4.8 of FREEDOM'S Indenture, the majority of the Trustees have hereby decided to, and do by these Presents, ORDER the immediate extinguishing of any and all Oaths of any nature, shape, cause, kind, form and format of any and all real-men working and/or conducting business for, and on behalf of, any and all purported government entities; and further, ORDER the same real-men to immediately Affirm and Subscribe the following, to wit:

    “I, ___________________________, do solemnly affirm that I will support, uphold and defend the Constitution for the United States of America C1819 and FREEDOM's Indenture against all enemies, foreign and domestic, at all times and all places, under the pains and penalties of Breach of Contract, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Breach of Trustee Duties, Perjury, Treason and Sedition, and further will uphold, support and defend the Creator given Rights, Privileges, Freedoms, Immunities and Properties of all Beneficiaries of FREEDOM, at all places and all times, under the pains and penalties of Breach of Contract, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Breach of Trustee Duties, Perjury, Treason and Sedition, and I enter this multifaceted contract with no false intentions, fully understanding all the terms, and the pains and penalties for any violation thereof, and that I take this of my own free will choice and without any mental evasion, so help me Creator.”

    Signed this________day of______________in the year of my Lord, Jesus Christ two thousand____________.




                 {Printed Name} {red thumb print}



               Verification by Trust Representative {red thumb print}


    The next step is the most important step and it happens to be a step that is the most difficult to accomplish and that would be "ENFORCEMENT"!  This enforcement will be needed to protect the tribunals of record.  I have the rules for this court of record tribunals and such rules are very simple as are the laws for the people which only consist of no harm to anyone, no property damage and maybe we can throw in honor all lawful contracts, that's it!

  • September 4, 2016 at 12:54 am

    How come there are no laws or court cases in this article proving it is true or works? What I'm seeing is that a US National is someone who is born in or has ties with "an outlying possession of the United States." Like American Samoa or Swains Island as of 2005. The two Islands the US allegedly "posesses." So you would need to be born there or have a parent or ties to there somehow, to be a US National. And US Nationals can't vote or hold office, not that I want. You are able to work and reside anywhere you want in the US as a US National. And you are able to apply for passports & citizenship. I'm not sure if the laws apply to them, but I would think they would. Here's the law saying what nationals & citizens are. How do you get around that? https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401

    • September 5, 2016 at 3:02 am

      Good point, of course the idea is there are differne status though. American Nati0nal May be a better distinction. They key is one must VOLUNTEER to admit to declare being a US Citizen, something to avoid at all costs.  I like Living Man best.

  • November 9, 2016 at 11:52 am

    If you claim to be man.    i, man, john: doe.    see the karl lentz talks they are inaccordance to 'you are law' never stand in court as defendant, that's not your name, does this then mean you are not a citizen, if you state, i, man, john: doe? or claim you rights as to  Gods law?    You are Law, is one of the better sites and the information is working for me this far;

    Through necessity i have studied how to protect i and my family….

    The corporation s are like a pack hungrey wolves taking turns to attack, replying pp, no signature, or a printed signature, one wolf takes a bite then quickley lets the next have ago, passing the liabilty to the next and the next each claiming they are the one to deal with now. they attempt to ignore my 'Conditional acceptance' and come up with threats, usualy an offer of an impending charge of fraud, prison, try to call me defendant, threaten to put a lein against my property, of which i built with my own hands and own out right, (no mortgage or loan) Now the IRS are sniffing around.

    i wrote a passage in my book refering to the subject at hand,  'Elliot's mirror' ,, kindle… I want to get the message across in all i do to man and woman, but for now i wrote it out as i did not want someone to come along one day and claim (in this compensation nation) that i was giving leagal advice and caused them harm in some form, i need to word within the passage some disclaimer that blends with the book, this will be difficult it is (fantasy romance) a little… well very extreme for some,   but any advice is welcome.

    I want man to become aware.

    A child in a playground asks if you like the girl with long hair. You don't fancy her at all, but so as not to hurt the girls feelings you decline to answer as she is in earshot. The child then says, 'if you don't answer then that means you do fancy her.' (you should rebut or it becomes true through silence) So the reply should be in the form of an question. "why do you want to know, is it because you fancies her? yes or no? or what makes you believe that?" This is how basic the law is, stupid childish and a hindrance to man, i believe.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WishList Member - Membership Software