When a BILL is Not Really a Bill
This explanation is proposing a much-needed paradigm shift in our mind regarding the bills we receive in the mail from corporations, including the United States (Inc.; a Corporation).
Everything commercial in our system is actually a Trust since 1933, because lawful money was taken out of circulation. After that a “Bill” cannot be a Bill, since they cannot “charge” anyone for anything since they know we have no money to pay for anything. This includes “charges" by so called courts and prosecutors. "Charges” are all commercial events.
Checks and all liability currency are “promises to pay”, and essentially are a dishonor event because actual payment is delayed. You technically can't “pay” anything since you have no substance money to pay with. However, in commerce, this MIS-TAKE can be forgiven.
So, then what is a “Bill”? Logically, it must be a request for us to authorize the release of “assets held in trust” by the Trustee as the so called payment (asset/credit – liability/debit = 0).
This “payment by EQUITABLE TITLE TRANSFER” results in the extinguishment of debt!
THAT is how we should be doing it. Notice that the amount on the bill is a positive number; a CREDIT. It does not have parentheses around it, or a minus sign in front of it, which commonly indicates a negative number.
This positive number represents an ‘asset” that will offset a liability held by the corporation for a commercial transaction. They just need our authorization. The only way to give and authorization is with an endorsement on the back of the bill (like endorsing a check), to get ownership of that asset amount as grantee of the instrument (receiving it as a trust), and as grantor to the party wanting credit money (transferring assets to them), so that they can then apply it to discharge the liability on their books for that same amount. They gave you paper to form a trust, you give them a signature on the back of that paper back = credit issued = settlement. Once the instrument is presented, we (you) have the equitable title to that amount.
When we indorse the back of a Bill, then the legal and equitable titles to the asset (credit) are now vested in that one piece of paper (it is all about trusts), and when that indorsed instrument is returned to the party that sent it, then that party is now the Holder in due course of the legal AND equitable titles to both the asset and liability amounts for that account. They must then EXTINGUISH the debt by operation of law.
The Corporation is already holding both legal and equitable titles to the Liability. They are also holding the legal title to the Asset as implied by them sending you the Bill (the US Corp and all their sub-corps hold legal title to all assets since 1933 and are Trustees, or agents thereof, per the purpose and intent of the HJR 192, June 5, 1933 TRUST , codified in 31 USC 5118). The only thing they are missing is the Equitable title to the Asset, so that they can finally do the discharge to balance the books and extinguish the debt. They have the charge (DEBIT/DEBT) amount – they just need the discharge (CREDIT/ASSET) amount to balance the books to zero.\
Having both of the titles for the asset/credit amount now allows them to use that asset/credit amount to perform their duty as Trustee to extinguish (discharge) the Liability/Debit (debt) amount by operation of law, the trust laws that are invoked when the legal and equitable titles are merged.
So The Bill is NOT a BILL, it is an asset credit voucher containing the credit amount that we must release to the Trustee (or agent thereof) by indorsing the back of the Bill and returning it. This is the duty that the beneficiaries (or agents thereof) have been failing to perform.
How can this apply?
Credit cards, mortgages, property tax bills, income taxes, child support, court charges, tickets, grand jury true bills/indictments, etc. It doesn’t matter what it is. A “charge is a bill. So form the trust and balance the books.