• Uncategorized

Massive Fraud in the Court – Case Reveals Breakthrough for The People

http://www.youarelaw.org/massive-fraud-in-the-court-case-reveals-breakthrough-for-the-people/

Federal tax case breakthrough: Petitioner demands Court’s constitutional authority; plaintiff and Court go silent; Petitioner demands immediate dismissal and costs, restitution, and damages of $1,841,451.45

Partial resource www.supremecourtcase.wordpress.com

Thereafter, Petitioner filed on September 30, 2015, Petitioner’s Demand for Dismissal, with Prejudice, of this Alleged Case for Lack of Constitutional Authority that Gives the Court the Capacity to Take Jurisdiction and Enter Judgments, Orders, and Decrees in Favor of the United States Arising from a Civil or Criminal Proceeding Regarding a Debt, in Tyler County, Texas (the “Demand for Dismissal”).

Plaintiff had until October 14, 2015, to produce the constitutional authority that gives the Court the capacity to take jurisdiction in Tyler County, Texas.

As of this post (October 28, 2015), 44 days have passed since the filing of the Objection and Demand and 28 since the Demand for Dismissal and neither the judge nor either of the Department of Justice attorneys has responded in any way following Petitioner’s demands.

The reason neither the judge nor DOJ attorneys will respond or confirm or deny Petitioner’s filings, is that anything that any of them may say in writing—whether for or against Petitioner—will evince treason to the Constitution, not only on their part, but on the part of every other Federal judge and DOJ attorney doing business anywhere in the Union.

Notwithstanding that the penalty for treason to the Constitution is death, the Federal judge and DOJ attorneys in this case have a more pressing situation on their hands:

The entire fraudulent Federal judicial apparatus is at stake because no contemporary Federal court has the capacity to take jurisdiction and enter judgments, orders, or decrees in favor of the United States arising from a civil or criminal proceeding regarding a debt, in any county, parish, or borough in America—and there is no reason why the above filings from this case will not produce the same results in any other Federal case, civil or criminal, anywhere in the Union.

If the Department of Justice cannot win a case anywhere in America, the days of the hoax of Federal jurisdiction over the American People are numbered.

The Federal tax case in the Lufkin Division was an attempt to foreclose on Federal tax liens filed against Petitioner’s ranch. Judge and plaintiff having departed the field of battle, said case is over in substance—Petitioner prevailing.

Regarding the original Federal tax case, United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division Civil No. 4:14-cv-0027 (which the Supreme Court declined to review): There are other remedies available to Petitioner and Petitioner is pursuing them. Developments will be posted on this website as they occur.

The case featured in this website appealed to the Supreme Court is Southern District of Texas, Houston Division No. 4:14-CV-0027.

There is another case against Petitioner being handled by the same Assistant U.S. Attorney, the sister case: Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division No. 9:14-CV-138 (the “Lufkin Case”).

Petitioner’s filings in the Lufkin Case have been fielded by multiple judges and magistrates from three different judicial districts. The government has made no progress in 14 months.

When Petitioner made a motion for the first judge in the Lufkin Case—Eastern District of Texas Chief Judge Ron Clark—to recuse (self-disqualify) himself for incompetence by reason of ignorance of law (and provided evidence proving the same), Judge Clark went silent and remained so. Six weeks later the case was removed to a different judicial district (Tyler Division) under a different judge. The case is now back in the Lufkin Division; Judge Clark is not involved.

You may also like...

9 Responses

  1. April says:

    I’M DEALING WITH THE SAME THING IN NEW JERSEY, I’VE FILED MULTIPLE
    LAWSUITS CHALLENGING JURIDICTION AND I GOT ONE RESPONSE FROM
    THE JUDGE ATTORNEY AND THAT WAS FOR DISMISSAL, I RESPONDED AND I HAVEN’T HEARD NOTHING MORE. SO NOW I’VE REQUESTED ALL OF THEIR CREDENTIALS, BONDS OATHS, SPOUSE NAMES BILL OF PARTICULAR, ANTI BRIBERY STATEMENTS NAME OF BANKS FOR CHECKING AND SAVINGS ACCOUNTS COURT TRUST ACCOUNTS AND THEY HAVE 21 DAYS TO RESPOND OR THEY WILL BE IN DEFAULT.

    • MJT says:

      Just be sure you follow through, that is your next step. you should know that before even filing this case. Sounds like you are on the right track. Oh by the way, who is “you”? Have you made that clear and done any status change work on the record to establish that? you are one of the people, not a person.

  2. thelma says:

    omg-i don’t even know how i got HERE and no, there are no drugs or alcohol involved,simply anxiety due to a BS TX probate code regarding disabled adults.
    this garbage is CPS on steroids,anyone can become guardian of your adult aged disabled son or daughter, become the guardian of your elders-
    WHO EMPOWERED THEM and how to get this crap removed/challenged-
    now of you are saying the federal level has no jurisdiction over us, what are we to do when the challenge to this junk legislation can get done based on violations of the 1st,4th and 14th A when there are not even allegations of abuse,neglect or exploitation ?
    these bastards can and do and have simply kidnapped and disappeared family members all according to the LAW as stated under TX probate codes starting w/section 683 and leading up to the guardian HAVING PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF THE WARD to their ex parte hearings when they find out YOU HAVE BEEN ATTEMPTING TO FIGHT BACK-remove you-kidnap-disappear—
    how to accomplish anything starting from WHO EMPOWERED THEM TO VIOLATE CLEARLY STIPULATED RIGHTS ?
    THIS is not a lower courts case.
    maybe someone can help and keep this on the boards ?

    • MJT says:

      None of that will help in their courts as a defendant. you must take it to common law as a property and trespass issue. YOU must be plaintiff to have a chance to win. Then YOU write the law of the case and control the rules. The writer of the law (of the case) IS the law.

  3. bob rutledge says:

    Be the Plaintiff and sue them in federal court. Your cost if handle it yourself are filing fees. Sue for $ damages and they also have to pay an attorney. Learn how. http://www.jurisdictionary.com Stop violation of rights.

  4. bob rutledge says:

    Sue the attorneys and their malpractice insurance will double or triple. They will comply with your demands and settle your case.

    • MJT says:

      Yes but you need a solid basis. Most rarely use their full name on their documents(judges, attorneys, etc), this is significant. The middle initial instead of full name is legally significant They must represent themselves in the same way in which they are licenses or they are covering up their true identity intentionally. It is all fraud, treason, impersonation of public officials, and more. All to hide their liability. You can also demand Bonds and Oath of Office since they are officers of the court, and they can rarely comply. BANG! By the way, a bar card is NOT a license issued by the government…. hmmmm

       

      TJ

  5. Andrew says:

    TJ,

     

    Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

     

    Hope you or another may help direct a Republic friend in need, who because of a physical tumble down flight of steps and six months in hospital still bed-ridden, finds meeting paper entries with both Bank Wells Fargo NA (discharged and bot reaffirmed in Ch7) and HOA who without cause inflation of numbers and no Audit did place themselves in Position to steal upon her home "condo" to sell the land, lot upon which her building does sit, and now says 90 days to cure fees expires after 12/29/2015 is in immediate need for assistance 

     

    I too am I'll from cognitive impairment that hinders my immediate and spontaneous abilities to jump on this.

     

    On her behalf and a resident while traveling in her home, request for another to facilitate papers or notice for her.

     

    The abode is locate in Citrus Heights, CA a neighbor to Sacramento.

    Her name is Susan Langsjoen.

    Ch7 discharged in April 2014

     

    My mobil number 760.681.0826

    Andrew Meyer

    Formerly of Saint Helen's, seat if oregon 

     

Powered by WishList Member - Membership Software