• Uncategorized
  • 11

Simple OPT OUT Is All It Takes!

http://www.youarelaw.org/simple-opt-out-is-all-it-takes/

Revocation of election to be treated as a resident of the District of Columbia – it is your right to clarify and choose  Source www.supremecourtcase.wordpress.com

“Qui jure suo utitur, nemini facit injuriam. He who uses his legal rights harms no one.” John Bouvier, Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Third Revision (Being the Eighth Edition), revised by Francis Rawle (West Publishing Co.: St. Paul, Minn. 1914) (hereinafter “Bouvier’s”), p. 2157

The Internal Revenue Code provides for one to revoke his (apparent) general election to be treated as a resident of the United States, defined by Congress in Title 26 U.S.C. to mean the District of Columbia[1] – and can be accomplished in as little as one sentence.

As any legal professional (other than one with a vested interest in the 26 U.S.C. 6013 general-election-facility hoax) can verify: No one can elect (choose) to be a resident of a particular geographic area for purposes of taxation without also (1) physically moving there and establishing his personal abode / dwelling / home, or (2) realizing earnings there.

There is no difference between “being a resident” and “being treated as a resident” of a particular place; the legal effect is the same.

That government pretends that all of the American People are residents of the District of Columbia, and treats them as such, which gives one an idea of the magnitude of the situation.

“Quando lex est specialis, ratio autem generalis, generaliter lex est intelligenda. When the law is special, but its reason is general, the law is to be understood generally.” Bouvier’s, p. 2156.

“GENERAL. Pertaining to, or designating, the genus or class, as distinguished from that which characterizes the species or individual. Universal, not particularized ; as opposed to special. Principal or central ; as opposed to local. Open or available to all, as opposed to select. Obtaining commonly, or recognized universally ; as opposed to particular. Universal or unbounded ; as opposed to limited. Comprehending the whole or directed to the whole ; as distinguished from anything applying to or designed for a portion only.” Henry Campbell Black, A Dictionary of Law (West Publishing Co.: St. Paul, Minn., 1890), p. 534.

The purported 26 U.S.C. 6013 election facility is designated as “general” and therefore is universal or unbounded (as opposed to limited) and is the ultimate inference used by actors in government to subject its creator, the American People, to rules of conduct and regulations, in the form of statutes, and deprive them of life, liberty, and property for alleged violation thereof, under color of law, office, and authority.

There is no constitutional authority for any American legislature to impose any rule or regulation on any American except to residents of the District of Columbia or one of the Territories, and no one can produce any such authority.

Actors in government and the Internal Revenue Service follow the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (which are grounded in fraud); they just did not expect that anyone would figure out the true meaning thereof.

The meaning of the definition of the Internal Revenue Code terms “United States” and “State” is the District of Columbia (see Memorandum of Law, August 10, 2015, p. 6, posted August 11, 2015, infra, for proof).

Anyone can revoke his alleged general election to be treated as a resident of the District of Columbia. To see Petitioner’s “Statement of Revocation,” LINK IN PRIVATE MEMBER AREA.

(Note: Revocation of election applies only to the current and future tax years; it does not apply retroactively to previous tax years.)

[1] See Memorandum of Law, August 10, 2015, pp. 8-18, posted August 11, 2015, infra, for proof.

[2] The wild-card in the 16th Amendment that fooled everyone is the meaning of the operative definition of the statutory term “State,” which is used in the text thereof and comprehends the District of Columbia and the Territories (see Memorandum of Law, August 10, 2015, pp. 4-8, posted August 11, 2015, infra, for proof).

Source www.supremecourtcase.wordpress.com

You may also like...

11 Responses

  1. Kirsten_on_LA says:

    For more information for those who are interested b/c his work is extensive … search Adele Weiss (weissparis(DOT)com) … He explains a Revocation of Election and everything surrounding the status “mix up”. To be clear, Mr. Weiss’ information is not in any way tied to this website or contents therein, but I found his work to be extremely helpful.

  2. Charles says:

    The Sixteenth Amendment use is mute since it was not legally passed. It is known as the law that never was. It is fraudulently in the constitution.

  3. Maz says:

    The way I understand it, 26 USC 6013(g) means that any non-resident alien who elected to be treated (ie. taxed) as a US resident may revoke (ie. cancel) that election.
    In other words, if you are not a non-resident alien, this option to revoke does not apply to you.
    If you are a US citizen or resident, then you can not revoke your taxpayer status by using this clause.
    This clause is only for the use of non-resident aliens.

    • MJT says:

      But isn’t a living man or woman already a “non resident” and “alien”; as meaning foreign to the citizenry of the geographic zone of DC”? Words matter. So YES you are all non-resident aliens by nature. Do you know who you are?

  4. Wally says:

    How do you not become a Canadian citizen

    • MJT says:

      Stop volunteering and admitting to being one. It is a club you joined, a society. So tell them you not longer want the benefit from it and want to return to your status as a free living being on the land.

  5. jbeing1 says:

    Sorry to say, it’s possible, but one does not make an election under 6013(g) to be treated as a resident of DC. Also, a nonresident alien individual is a statutory capacity used in the code to describe certain activity by non US citizens. You are only excepted from the tax if you are acting as a certain kind of nonresident alien individual with no US source income, it’s just that simple, the trick is knowing who you are and where you live.

    • MJT says:

      They also use the code to define words in the code to make it harder to see the remedy, EVERY word must be defined to even “understand’ it. Stop acting as if we the people understand ANY of their codes (which generally apply to government employees as mere administrative code/regulations), because we don’t and can’t STAND under them. They usually do no apply. IF we say we have NO “understanding” (no accepting or standing under) = NO contract which we are held to. Stop making agreements and volunteering folks. That’s it.

    • MJT says:

      Yes, but by answering to the NAME they created, you admit otherwise, now they can presume you are a US citizen (slave of DC). be careful not to volunteer. Stop following the yellow brick road like you are told.

  6. Pat says:

    What do you do if they incarcerate the body of that US Citizen NAME?

Leave a Reply

WordPress spam blocked by CleanTalk.
Powered by WishList Member - Membership Software