About

REQUIRED READING FOR NEW MEMBERS

A Private Member Association. Membership is subject to the rules and regulations of associations and/or ministry entities.

Who is Trinity Freedom Ministries, SSM?

Our ministry and web site members are a private member association. We merely believe in the right of man to have open discussions and to conduct research on our system of laws in an effort to help one another understand how to deal with legal situations more effectively through education and association with other members.


DISCLAIMERS – We do not provide legal or tax advice. We do not claim to be experts in any given field.  One should always seek “competent counsel” regarding legal or tax related issues. We do research and provide an open forum for education and entertainment purposes only. All the information on our site or exchanged between members is considered a private communication under the protection of our right to free speech. We would never willfully commit an unlawful act against another party or entity or violate any law. Even if the information on this site is mis-interpreted as legal advice we refer you to the following:

PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT;
A. The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239
B. The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT!
Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925) ****

Amendment VI – U.S. Constitution

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

At Trinity Freedom Ministries, SSM we freely discuss and support the concepts of a right to counsel, free speechand free association as provided by the Constitution. We provide a forum for open discussion and sharing among free living men and women which cannot be regulated. We do provide education for our members and teach them how to more effectively assert common law solutions to resolve matters.

Therefore, we do not give “”legal” or “tax” advice, nor can we be held liable for any outcomes from the use of this information, or the actions taken by the user or participant in this website.  Many contributors add content here. Any such claims of damage shall be considered only as it applies in common law and between a living man/woman who can prove they are a verifiable damaged party willing to testify to that claim.

We do not “protest” the government or its agencies. We advocate for better, fair, solvent limited government By the People. We do remind our public servants that “We The People” are the government, whom our servants “serve”. We naturally advocate that government obey the law and act to protect “we the people” from enemies both foreign and domestic, as their trust fiduciary duty requires.  We do not condone attacks or suing the innocent. We encourage peaceful and proper interaction between government, corporations, and the “people” who the government “serves”.

For the record, we encourage anyone who owes a verified bill, debt or statutory obligation to file the required forms. If there is a verified contractual obligation, then one should keep those commitments. The contract is the law. We offer suggestions on how to verify the authority of any person or claim made against you, by anyone or any entity. We teach our members to demand a verified claim before they presume that a claim is true! You'll be surprised how often they fail to LAWFULLY prove their claim. The burden of proof is on the accuser.

FURTHER DISCLAIMERS and Belief Regarding the Right to Proceed Personally vs. Having Attorney Type Counsel.

Our Ministry provides our members with a venue for free speech and association, with discussions and research support for common law issues. Many people find themselves protecting their own God given rights pursuant to the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and according to Article 1, Section 22 of the Washington State Constitution (and relevant Oregon Constitution). WE DO NOT PROVIDE ANY KIND OF LEGAL ADVICE OR OTHER ADVICE FOR A FEE.

There is no question that everyone has a Constitutional right to defend themselves “personally” and seek any “counsel” of their choosing. When one is defending themselves, they have all the same rights as any attorney. One has the right to hire a private paralegal or seek private counsel of one's choice. Members often deal with serious civil and sometimes criminal matters.

Be sure to seek competent legal counsel when needed. Members often provide “assistance of counsel” to one another. As contemplated by the Sixth Amendment and the first Judiciary Act of 1789, passed on September 24, 1789, which is an Act of Congress, see 1 Stat 73 at section 35 and 28 U.S.C. 1654.  We help educate our members who choose to appear in person and to handle their own legal matters. These individuals choose self-representation and the right to speak on their own behalf.


FURTHER RESEARCH ON THE “PRACTICE OF LAW”

For many, there is confusion between the terms practicing law and private counsel. The following research summary clarifies many points of interest.  Based on substantial research, analysis and legally admissible evidence, we can safely conclude the following:

  1. There is no such thing legally defined anywhere in any enactment of any government that is specifically called a “license to practice law”.
  2. An “Admission to Practice” issued by the U.S. Supreme Court functions as the de facto equivalent of a “license to practice law”.
  3. Individual courts also issue admissions to practice to attorneys who VOLUNTARILY apply for it.
  4. Neither the Constitution nor any legislative act within any state of the Union can or does specifically authorize a justice of the state Supreme Court to issue “Admissions to Practice”.  Therefore, there can be no lawful authority to issue such grants of privilege.
  5. The Ninth and Tenth Articles to the United States Constitution specifically reserve all powers not delegated by the Constitution to the People or the States respectively.  Therefore, the Federal government has never been empowered to issue “licenses” or “admissions” to practice law.  Neither can this authority be implied from the “necessary and proper” clauses found anywhere in the Constitution.
  6. The idea of “licenses to practice law” is therefore primarily a “judicial doctrine” that cannot adversely affect the Constitutionally protected rights of any man or woman.
  7. All those persons represented by a licensed attorney are “wards of the court”, incapable of executing their own defense or litigation.  As such, “licensed attorneys” are there to represent them as “incompetents” and the authority of the state to license such attorneys derives from the need to protect such incompetent persons.
  8. It is not a crime to practice law without a license and there can be no adverse consequences for doing so, for any person not domiciled on federal territory under exclusive federal jurisdiction, so long as the person doing so identifies themselves NOT as an “attorney”, but as a “Counselor at Law”.
  9. The only case where any judge or public official may mandate or influence one’s choice of counsel is in the case of public traded entities, such as corporations.  Private corporations and private persons may not be controlled or regulated in their choice of legal “counsel” to only those who have been licensed or admitted to practice by the state supreme Court.
  10. The only legitimate purpose for “licensing” of attorneys is to protect the public.  In practice, public servants abuse this regulatory authority delegated to them NOT to protect the public, but to stifle all attorneys from speaking the truth in open court about government and official corruption, especially as it pertains to the judiciary.
    10.2. Establish and further the ends of a legal profession monopoly on the practice of law designed to further their own private economic ends.

The authority to “practice law” conveyed upon “counsel” or a “counselor at law” as a private para-legal (vs paralegal) includes the following:

11.1. Preparing pleadings, discovery, and execute discovery.

11.2. Arguing issues of law before the court.

11.3. Advising the assisted party of his rights and options.

The word “attorney” is not equivalent to “counsel” as used in the Sixth Amendment.  All licensed “attorneys” may also be classified as “counsel”, but not all counsel need be licensed attorneys within the meaning of the Sixth Amendment.  You can simply proceed to speak personally. Any claims to the contrary will require proof of a damaged party with respect to the unlicensed practice of law by the living man or woman who is a damaged party due to this mysterious “practice”, who will testify under oath and quote the law and/or contract which applies where someone was practicing law without disclosure of these facts.  Any reader and member of this web site is so noticed.


The absolute required training tool for all law studying members to succeed
How to Win In Court Without an Attorney DETAILS HERE


 

 

Share