Why we must learn the law and not rely myths


Use the court don’t run from them.

The idea of running FROM the court system is a disinformation myth to keep the people from learning the law and how it favors them if there is no harmed or endangered party. Dont chase patriot aka sovereign citizen myths. Go on offense often and get your rights heard.

A recent response from the Sui Juris Law group –

Only criminals should fear the courts or the cage. Those who have not caused actual injury or violation of rights to another, should never fear the courts, nor should they be afraid to go into that court and speak the truth that they know. People have to understand the difference between a COURT which involves due process of law, and a kangaroo court drumhead trial which is a predetermined matter decided before the proceedings even begin. Every one of us should be able to access these courts to defend ourselves and our affairs from intrusion by the government or others.

As long as you know in your heart what is true, and refuse to back away from that truth, you are immune. You are only in danger if you allow the court to intimidate and deceive you into contracting with them. What is done with matters that do not involve actual harm to another, is YOU are agreeing in contract to give a SECURITY INTEREST to the court, and pledging your physical person as surety, like taking out a collateral loan at a pawn shop. It is just a transaction of a security interest. There is little the judge can really do to you at all. They just do not have the authority, and if you know your rights and are not afraid to stand up for them, you will be fine. Remember a judge is no more powerful than YOU are. YOU are EQUAL to the judge, he/she is not your superior.

To be clear these courts are OUR courts, the judge is just an employee in it.

You do live in one of the most judicially corrupt states that exist. The judges there more so than anywhere else actually believe that they ARE the law. Judges have a very narrowly defined scope of authority, and they can be charged with crimes for their lawlessness just like any one else. The reason we have PUBLIC courts in the first place is so the public can keep the judge in line, the problem is today that the average individual is so ignorant of the law their rights and power of a judge, that they are easily deceived into contracting with the court to legitimize the fraud negligence and corruption these judges force upon people.

ONLY a JURY can remove rights from an individual.

EVERYONE involved in ANY form of Sui Juris methodology, should ALWAYS carry a writ of habeus corpus with them for exactly the event where a corrupt bureaucrat may decide to violate their rights. People have to understand that even if they are being held in custody to ensure their appearance for trial (remanded) they are not the same as prisoners in that jail whom have been convicted. While it is routinely customary to that those awaiting trial the same way as you would a prisoner, it is improper and wholly lawless to do so. People also have to understand that just because something is done a certain way, and has been for a long time, that alone does not mean what is being done is lawful.

For example one who has not been convicted of anything, who has been remanded without bail to ensure they appear for trial, possesses all of the same rights as the people. To restrict the freedom of such an individual, as well as their access to technologies to prepare their defense and contact their loved ones, is itself a crime. ONLY CONVICTED CRIMINALS may have their rights removed or suspended and ONLY by a jury upon conviction of a crime. It doesn’t matter what rule one breaks nor how frequently they break that rule if they cause no actual harm to another there is nothing criminal about it. It is not a crime to defy the will of the state/people/majority/group of citizens in contract. Especially where it is that the will of the State infringes the freedom of the individual.

CONTEMPT is also another very misunderstood concept. A judge cannot just throw that term around to threaten and intimidate you, you cannot be in contempt for simply exercising your right to ask questions because you do not understand the cause and nature of the charges and proceedings. And understand you are not wasting the courts time, they are wasting YOURS with respect to statutory compliance matters with absolutely NO actual harm nor complaining party. EVERYTHING these courts do that doesn’t involve the lawful defense and protection of the rights and property of the individual people is itself a crime.

“CRIME” is perverting the courts, and offices of common law like sheriff and Notary Pubic, into tools to generate a stream of revenue for the state. there should NOT be police on the highways citing people as glorified hall monitors, for statutory compliance concerns. As long as one is conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner not causing damage or even risk of harm to others, there is no statutory compliance concern to justify interfering in the private travel of a sovereign inhabitant.

In fact if they use emergency lights to stop you without a warrant or an actual emergency THEY are committing the crime. The police with help from the judges and lawyers (THE BLUE LIGHT GANG) are constantly committing crimes against the people, and while this is going on there is REAL crime to fight like rapists, pedophiles, and REAL honest to goodness human trafficking going on, it disgusts me that police are even doing this statutory compliance bull shit. We need to entirely reeducate the people of this country to rights and law, and FAST. Government has gone too far, and has intimidated enough of my members.

The very fact that you have an inkling of fear related to being placed into a cage simply for walking into a court and to make a defense against charges that are baseless to begin with without a complaining party, is itself a travesty of justice.

JUSTICE the COURTS, the MAGISTRATE, and the SHERIFF himself, ALL have a duty to protect your freedom, and if they fail to do their duty YOU have recourse against THEM!


6 thoughts on “Why we must learn the law and not rely myths

  • October 31, 2017 at 12:57 pm

    Thank you MJT for sharing this inspiring article of hope.
    Here are few additional commentaries pertaining to this article regarding “learning the law” and not relying on disinformation myths”. I pray that the interested readers find the following commentaries only as non-legal advice and for educational purposes and to be constructively informative.

    Even though the inspiring article published above touches on some very important points about what are disinformation myths, the following commentaries may add a further explanation of what “learning the law” essentially entails and what is required of one, during the prosecution of a court case, in order to be able to protect one’s own rights which is one’s sole duty and responsibility… only one is responsible for one’s destiny… of course, also sometimes with the teamwork of other supporting teammates. Certainly one cannot expect for any attorney to provide the protection of one’s rights, and certainly no judge is going to provide such protection of one’s rights. This duty and responsibility devolves on one’ own initiative. It’s our own ignorance of the “laws” that leads us to the slaughter within the so called halls (cattle gates) of justice.

    So what exactly is meant by the phrase, “learning the laws”?

    In order for any one to win in court one must first know that each one of us are endowed with God given inherent inalienable rights (unless one voluntarily contracts said rights away). One must also know that the “laws” consist of: the Declaration Of Independence, the Constitution for the United States, the State Constitution for one’s state of domicile, the State Rules Of Court, the Local Rules of Court, Standing Orders of Local Judges, the Rules Of Civil Procedure, the Rules of Evidence, the Rules For Jury Instructions, and the Rules Of Appellate Procedure… all of which are available on the internet for one’s implementation and enforcement of such “laws” at the federal level and at the state and county levels. Further, if “code pleading” comes into play within one’s court case and within one’s pleadings (claims: allegations, assertions, and defenses), then one must also learn the codes, regulations, rules, and statutes at either the federal level and the state level (depending in which court one’s court case is being heard. Such codes are too numerous to mention here, but briefly for example two codes are, the “Civil Code” and the “Penal Code” at the state level(s), or the “United States Code” / “Statutes At Large” at the federal level(s) where there are institutional instrumentalities of US DISTRICT COURTS located throughout the republic states of the union otherwise known as the ‘continental United States’ which are the several states of the union or the united states of the American Republic or the United States of America – see… http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=%22continental+united+states%22&f=treesort&fq=true&num=0&hl=true&edition=prelim&granuleId=USC-prelim-title1-section1 and scroll down to the last footnote…
    “Continental United States”
    Pub. L. 86–70, §48, June 25, 1959, 73 Stat. 154 , provided that: “Whenever the phrase ‘continental United States’ is used in any law of the United States enacted after the date of enactment of this Act [June 25, 1959], it shall mean the 49 States on the North American Continent and the District of Columbia, unless otherwise expressly provided.”

    To learn of these “laws” one must first become aware that such an array of “laws” do in fact exist in the first place, and to know that such “laws” do in fact control the entire procedures of the courts. Then second, one must become familiar with such “laws” and competent enough to utilize and enforce such “laws” while one is navigating through one’s judicial court case to effectively and successfully prove one’s actions (claims and defenses) for the RECORD of the court case.

    A basic fundamental key principle to keep in one’s heart, mind, and soul for winning a court case is that one must understand the key concept that a judicial officer (hearing: commissioner, judge, magistrate, mediator, referee, etc.) assigned to hearing a court case is strictly bound and obligated by these “laws” for arriving at and making a judicial determination (a court’s judicial: Decree, Determination, Holding, Opinion, Order, Ruling, Write, etc) based solely upon the RECORD of a court case… and the RECORD of the court case consists of all relevant EVIDENCE (relevant: Facts and Law) which have been properly and timely admitted into the RECORD of the court case.

    Knowledge Is Power.
    Knowledge / Power brings peace into one’s heart because peace springs faith, hope, love and genuine truthful respect for one’s self and for others. “PEACE = Power.” And if one learns how to wield this “Power” gracefully and mercifully one will be successful in taking the “Power” back from the corrupt segments of our society and back into the hands of the just for the sake of true lawful justice and for the welfare of mankind in general.

    Therefore, the key point for a litigant to focus on is knowing how to get all of one’s supporting EVIDENCE into the RECORD of the court case and knowing how to keep out the opponent’s “proposed” supporting EVIDENCE out of the RECORD of the court case. And in so doing, it will be required of one to ensure that one files into the RECORD of the court case any and all supporting pleadings (Answers, Affidavits, Motions, Notices, Statements, Proof Of Services, etc.), which are admissible into the RECORD of the court case all of which should be composed of a “declaration under oath of penalty of perjury” (verification) to give it substantial admissible weight upon which the court can lawfully rely upon in the court’s final decision of one’s court case. It is very important to learn and know which particular filings (pleadings) are required by the “laws,” previously mentioned above, and how and when to appropriately and timely file said filings pursuant to the time schedules required by said “laws.” By so doing, one is ensured that such appropriate and timely filed filings will be a part of the RECORD of the court case. Once again it’s important to know and to remember that It is solely upon the RECORD of the court case upon which a judicial officer will make and issue the court’s determinations (Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law).

    Oh, and so this very important maxim and principle does not slip by,… one must also keep close to one’s heart, mind, and soul that, “He who consents, receives no injury.”

    In other words, he who consents by tacit agreement (failing to rebut the opponent’s ‘proposed’ offers: allegations, assertions, claims, defenses, and “proposed” evidence without asserting one’s objection or without one asserting one’s claims and defenses as a counter-offer of proof in opposition to the opponent’s asserted claims) has essentially waived one’s opportunity or right(s) to properly establish a favorable RECORD of one’s court case in favor of one’s support. By one not properly and timely rebutting the opponent’s “proposed” offers then one In essence consents to having one’s opponent’s “proposed” offers admitted into the RECORD of the court case. And it is upon such RECORD of one’s court case which the judicial officer of the court (preferably within a “court of record” proceeding under the “common law” jurisdiction) will make and issue the court’s legal determination of the matter set forth in front of the judicial officer for the judicial officer’s consideration… and the entire judicial process is as simple as that.

    An additional note as for emphasizing the quotation marks for the term “proposed” as mentioned in the previous paragraph. It is imperative that one must learn, know, and understand that every relationship established between the parties (throughout the proceedings of one’s court case) is based mainly on the law of “Contracts”. Meaning that every thing… all: allegations, assertions, claims, pleadings, etc. offered by one’s opponent are to be considered and viewed by one as being mere “proposed offers”. And under the law of “Contracts” there must exist the presence of the following contractual elements: “a proposed offer”, “a consideration”, “full disclosure of the terms of the proposed offer” and “an acceptance”. In other words, there must be a meeting of the minds based on full disclosure in order to constitute a valid contract. Therefore if one does not object or rebut “proposed” offers, then one consents to said “proposed” offers.

    Learn the “laws” in order to submit all supporting EVIDENCE in one’s favor into the RECORD of the case. Also, know that one may actually use much of the proposed evidence (opponent’s filings / pleadings and exhibits) offered by the opponent (if they are acting corruptly) against them. How can one do this, one might ask?

    During the process of a court case (from the initial phase of filing and serving of a Complaint / Lawsuit’, Indictment, Notice requiring Appearance, and thru the proceedings of: Arraignment, Meet And Confer Conference, Case management Conferences, Discovery, etc.) for each filing (pleading, including also court transcripts of hearings) filed by the opponent and served upon you, one has the right to ask for a certified filed-stamped copy of said filings or hearing transcripts from the court clerk. Once one has a certified filed-stamped copy of said filing one can draft an Affidavit describing all the wrongs committed by one’s opponents as shown with those filings. And within one’s Affidavit one can reference the opponent’s filings by labeling each one of them as one’s EXHIBIT “1”, “2”, “3” etc. or as one’s EXHIBIT “A”, “B”, “C”, etc. and attach the exhibits to one’s properly formulated AFFIDAVIT and then file one’s AFFIDAVIT and attachments of EXHIBITS with the clerk of court as EVIDENCE for the RECORD of one’s court case. At the next hearing in open court one may simply request of the hearing Judicial officer to have said AFFIDAVITS and attached EXHIBITS to be entered into the RECORD file of one’s court case.

    If one’s court case proceeds to the trial phase one must make sure to have a complete EXHIBIT LIST and WITNESS LIST. If one is going to call witnesses to the witness stand make sure to also issue SUBPOENAS to the opponent’s witnesses in order to have them as one’s witnesses. In doing so, one is able to conduct “Direct Examination” of one’s witness with unlimited scope whereupon one stands a better chance of getting the witness to testify to facts which one wishes to get onto the RECORD of one’s court case. Otherwise, one will be “limited” to asking questions of the opponent’s witnesses under the rules of “CROSS-EXAMINATION” pursuant solely to the scope of the opponent’s witness’ testimony testified to under the course of the “Direct Examination” conducted by one’s opponent.

    That’s it for now…
    Dignity, Love, Peace, and Power to us all,

    • October 31, 2017 at 1:41 pm

      Credit for most of the tactics and strategies stated previously is properly due and owing to:
      * Rich Iverson (who fives credit to Richard McDonald) at
      *immafreemann at

      Basic Outline of a Court Case
      Filing and serving of Complaint / Lawsuit by the Plaintiff to Defendant
      Filing and serving of Answer / Response to the Complaint by the Defendant to Plaintiff
      with ATTACHMENTS
      CROSS-COMPLAINT (Counter-Claim)
      Case is set for CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ONE by the Clerk of Court
      MEET & CONFER in person or by telephone between Plaintiff & Defendant
      Filing of DECLARATIONS for MEET & CONFER by Plaintiff and by Defendant
      Filing of CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT by Plaintiff and by Defendant
      Filing of other PLEADINGS
      Motions (at any time during the proceedings)
      Notices (at anytime during the proceedings)
      DISCOVERY OF EVIDENCE by both the Plaintiff and the Defendant
      REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS set 1 propounded by Plaintiff to the Defendant
      RESPONSE to REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS set 1 by Defendant to the Plaintiff
      REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS set 1 propounded by Defendant to the Plaintiff
      RESPONSE to REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS set 1 by Plaintiff to the Defendant
      Filing of other PLEADINGS
      Motions (at any time during the proceedings)
      Notices (at anytime during the proceedings)
      Additional CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TWO by the Clerk of Court per Judge
      Setting of TRIAL HEARING DATE by Judge
      Selection of Jury Panel
      Opening Statements by Plaintiff
      Opening Statements by Defendant
      Presentation of case by Plaintiff
      Direct Examination by Plaintiff of Plaintiff’s Witnesses
      Cross-Examination by Defendant of Plaintiff’s Witnesses
      Presentation of case by Defendant
      Direct Examination conducted by Defendant of Defendant’s Witnesses
      Cross-Examination conducted by Plaintiff of Defendant’s Witnesses
      Closing Arguments by Plaintiff
      Closing Arguments by Defendant
      Additional Follow-Up Closing Arguments by Plaintiff only
      Jury Instructions given to Jury by Judge
      Jury Deliberations
      Pronouncement of Jury Verdict
      Sentencing by Judge
      Allocution by Defendant
      Final Decision by Judge
      The above outline is not a complete nor exhaustive outline.
      Do your own research and verify all facets of a court proceeding for your own operating knowledge.

      Dignity, Love, Peace, and Power to us all,

  • November 7, 2017 at 1:07 pm

    Hey, Quick look on Pacer, guy in E. Tenn is taking IRS lawyers to court using common law,
    saying they filed false claims, recently filed still in progress. Case is 3:17-CV-323, this stuff is starting to catch on!!! Wish we could see more folks doing same.

  • November 16, 2017 at 9:20 am

    No one should have to worry about whether they are contracting with the court or not. Very few have the time or understanding to learn all this stuff. So what good will it do the masses? Are you willing to put up with a corrupt commercial court system that will walk over everyone who doesn’t know this “secret knowledge” or would you rather the courts be based solely upon did someone harm another? I don’t know if special admiralty can be removed from the justice system or not but it is unacceptable and we must work toward removing it from our midst. There can be no justice for all if it is incomprehensible to the common man.
    Court room procedure should be something like this: Who here has a claim against me?
    I do
    What is your claim?
    you harmed my car, house, daughter, whatever.
    I did not and here is my proof.
    yes you did, and here is my proof.
    What say ye, jury?
    That’s it. NO one should have to worry about entering into a contract that is not on the table and fully disclosed. But that is what it has come to. And it requires hours and hours and hours to understand. That’s not justice, that’s sophistry.

  • November 25, 2017 at 8:02 pm

    Do you realize there is a difference between inalienable and unalienable? The Creator endowed us with Unalienable Rights. There is a difference.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WishList Member - Membership Software