Using Racketeering Argument to Reverse of a Federal Conviction?

USING  RACKETEERING  TO  FORCE  A REVERSE  OF  A  FEDERAL  CONVICTION (3rd party posting)

As always – not legal advice

If you know of anyone convicted on victim-less crimes if a so called US District court, take a look.

We have proven that 18 USC 3231 cannot be used for a court to create a judgment against you. No quorum existed on May 12, 1947  when Congress voted on the act. Article I, Section 5, Clause 1 of the Constitution. United States v. Ballin, Joseph & Company. That is the only case law you will need.

We have proven that the 1940 statute for Title 18, jurisdiction of the court, was repealed in 1948. We have proven that the request by Harley Lappin in 1909 for a determination by the number 2 person in the Department of Justice to investigate the jurisdiction of the court resulted in a determination that 18 USC section 3231 is void, ab initio.

Since that is the only statute that grants a federal court the authority to issue a judgment against a person, we have proven that any judgment issued since 1948 is a fraud by the government. We have proven that a court cannot use the Court cannot use the 1909 predicate for 18 USC 3231 because it violates the Fair Warning Doctrine. We have proven that we are the only witnesses in the country that can testify in an offer of proof to the 6 documents from clerks of the House and Senate confirming that no statute exists for any imprisonment.

We have proven that you are entitled to immediate release for false imprisonment. We have proven that as an officer of the court, the US attorney was required to notify the court and demand your immediate release.

Now for the damages….

The actions of the DOJ fall under Racketeering, see 18 USC sections 1961, et seq. 35 predicates exist for RICO. Included in the predicates are mail fraud and wire fraud.

Anytime the DOJ served you or your attorney any document it constitutes a racketeering act, because it is mail fraud.

The fact the US attorney, as an officer of the court, did not notify the court to release you, it constitutes a racketeering act. Any request for penalties, restitution, and seizure of assets constitutes a racketeering act.

Also see 18 USC 513(a), Counterfeit securities.  Any action to collect a debt which is unlawful because the court had no jurisdiction constitutes a racketeering act.

So what are your damages? The average recovery for false imprisonment is $3,500 per day.

Case in Chicago, $10,000,000 for 10 years.

Case in Denver, 12,000,000 for 10 years.

Case in Boston, $125,000,000 for 4 people.

Case in Houston.  But the damages are clear, average recovery is about $3,500 per day.

Now here is the beautiful part about RICO. A judge in Oklahoma several years ago stated that RICO in federal courts was the equivalent of a thermonuclear bomb. So damages from the RICO charge automatically triple. Instead of $3,500 per day you are entitled to 3 times that amount. Plus you can prove from our affidavit and testimony that the people guilty knew they were committing racketeering.

That gives you access to the damages plus the right to request their indictment.

Welcome to RICO.

Fraud Upon the Court and How to Use it to Win on 18 USC section 3231 the only federal statute since 1948 that authorizes prosecution of any federal crime. No statute of limitations exists for an action brought pursuant to FRCiv.P. 60(d)(3).

Typically, motions to set aside judgments are subject to a one year bar.  FRCiv.P. 60(b)(3). If however, a Petitioner alleges that a fraud was committed agains the court, there is no such bar. We will explain why no federal conviction is valid since 1948 and how to use fraud upon the court to have it overturned.

You may want to visit www.GrassfireCommunications.com for updates

It's the Game Changer for all of us.