How to Control Judges and Win

Salutations and thank you for the information you’ve made available to free members,
I just watched your, “How to Control Judges in Court and Win”. May I present a hypothetical to see if I grasp what you are presenting… When establishing my standing I have many choices, for example: #1) addressing the trust, #2) entering by quasi-admission my readily survey-able carbon based, calorie burning, electro-chemical three dimensional vessel which my spirit pilots and chooses to transmit onto that terra firma perch which I have now constructed in your chamber and thus will stand as substitutionary evidence in direct contra distinction to that transmitting utility form which resembles my vessel’s title, but isn’t attached…. Then there is… #3) AND THIS SEEMS TO BE THE BEST CHOICE CONSIDERING WHAT YOU’VE SHARED… Inform the Judge that
Within “Vital Statistics Law of 1953 Cl. 35 ACT Jun. 29, 1953, P.L. 304, No. 66”, at the end of it’s table of contents and situated prior to the body of this work, this specific phrase in inserted… “The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows.” Now, this announces in absolute clarity that all Acts, Statutes, Laws, Ordinances, Codes, Policies, etc. contained within, and explained throughout, that body, the Department of Health and Vital Statistics Laws, that those are not constitutionally viable, as the proper preamble for true Constitutional Acts should read, “BE IT ENACTED BY THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN CONGRESS ASSEMBLED”(Constitution of September 17, 1787).
I am bringing this to you (the Judge) in the hopes that you do your research into this controversy which your OFFICES facilitate upon “We the People”, as you, and your staff, are not the officiators of the REGISTERS COURT-In American Law.. A court in the State of Pennsylvania which has jurisdiction over probate. Who’s jurisdiction is overtly proven in that the ‘Chester County Clerk of Courts Office’ also known as the “Register of Wills/ Orphans Court” also known as “REGISTERS COURT” has, under article VI sections 601 through 604 ‘ the change of civil status’; the presiding forum of jurisdiction wherein the registrar has entered my supplemental name on record, thus, efficiently transmitting my statistical data by summary execution by way of the prothonotary of the orphans court ergo statistical incorporation of me conjured into that form which the department prescribed at their whim. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, on the day of July 26, 1964, the very date upon which my name was added to the Chester County Clerk of Courts registry from the supplemental name report which he registrar stamped his/her attestation to on line 19 of my birth certificate; what I see as an unconscionable Adhesion Contract’ of such ‘Inofficious Testament’, a truly involuntary ‘Negotiable Trust’ ‘Confusion of Title’ instrument did incorporate ‘Lying in Grant’ while “Lying in Wait’, and that incorporation became the property of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Which is further proven through case law, “Steffen and Russell the Negotiability of Corporate Bonds (1932) 41 Yale L.J. 799. Registration- Relates to the machinery, set up by the issuing company… ordinarily without the aid of legislation… to govern the transfer of securities”. So, as I see it, any controversy involving that person entitled with a Capitis Dimutio Maxima styled name, even though it resembles me, is not me, and is beholden to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and their “Court of Chester County clerk of Courts Office” the premier court of jurisdiction… That is unless you would like to challenge the truth of what I have attested to herein?